Comparison of the impact of two types of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of the remaining teeth: A prospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the impact of two removable partial dentures (acrylic removable partial denture [ARPD] and metallic removable partial denture [MRPD]) on periodontal tissues of the remaining teeth in the first 12 months of denture use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 40 patients, of which 20 received ARPDs, 20 received MRPDs, nine in the maxilla, and 11 in the mandible each. The patients were 45-65 years old; 24 were females, and 16 were males. Patients' demographic details, clinical indicators of periodontal complications, and biochemical measurement of Hs-C-reactive protein (CRP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were considered. One-way analysis of covariance and Friedman were used to measure the differences in clinical periodontal parameters between the two types of dentures. RESULTS: The significant findings were: Plaque index (PLAQ) scores for abutment teeth were higher in MRPD wearers (mean = 12.15) than ARPD wearers (mean = 10.45), whereas ARPD users had significantly higher mean bleeding on probing (BOP) values (mean = 1.5) than MRPD users (mean = 0.00); mobility of abutment teeth showed no significant differences; timeline comparisons showed a significant increase in the percentage of nonabutment teeth mobility in ARPD users (p = .028) compared with MRPD users over the same follow-up period (p = .102). CONCLUSIONS: For a short-term period of 1 year, periodontal and mobility parameters have no significant impact on the abutment and nonabutment teeth of ARPD and MRPD users. Moreover, biochemical markers (CRP and ALP) for periodontal inflammation exhibited no significant difference in both types of dentures.

Comparative analysis of the effect of 4MATRIX with and without PRF on regeneration of infrabony periodontal pockets.

Aim: The aim was to compare the effect in improvement of periodontal pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) between application of 4MATRIX and 4 MATRIX combined with PRF in advanced periodontal disease during follow-up of 6, 12 and 18 months. Methods: Thirty patients of both genders aged 25-50 years were included. The patients were clinically and radiologically diagnosed with generalized advanced chronic periodontitis with the presence of periodontal pockets with a depth of ≥ 5 mm bilaterally in the upper jaw. Both sides were treated with a flap intervention in all patients. On one side a bone substitute 4MATRIX was applied, and the other side was treated with an application 4MATRIX and PRF. The clinical assessment and measurements were performed in four stages, immediately before the intervention, and then 6, 12 and 18 months after the intervention. PPD and CAL were determined in all four timepoints. Results: PPD was the highest at zero time before the surgery for both groups and was 5.56 ± 0.28 mm. In the postoperative follow-up period, the PPD value decreased gradually with the lowest average value of 5.10 ± 0.18 mm after 18 months in Group I and 4.67 ± 0.13 mm in Group II (p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, comparing the values of PPD at 6, 12 and 18 months after the surgery, a significant difference was found between the patients from the 4MATRIX vs 4MATRIX + PRF (p < 0.001 respectively). The postoperative follow-up period showed a decrease in CAL value with the lowest value after 18 months. A significant difference in CAL was found between the four measurement times (p < 0.001, respectively). The average level of CAL was the highest before surgical treatment in both groups. The intergroup analysis of CAL after 18 months in group I (4MATRIX) was 5.27 ± 0.17 mm and in group II 4.10 ± 0.14 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Treatment of adult patients with advanced chronic periodontitis with periodontal pockets of ≥ 5 mm bilaterally in the upper jaw using 4MATRIX and 4MATRIX + PRF showed improvement of PPD and lower CAL loss after 18 months of the treatment. In the group treated with 4MATRIX + PRF patients showed the highest improvement in PPD and CAL loss. The analysis of treatment with 4MATRIX and 4MATRIX + PRF showed the lowest values after 18 months of the treatment.

Frequency of Complete and Removable Partial Denture Treatment in the Primary Health Centres in Three Different Regions of Kosovo from 2002 to 2013.

INTRODUCTION: Edentulism and prosthodontic care are very common, especially in the elderly. The study investigated the treatment with complete dentures (CDs) and acrylic removable partial dentures (ARPDs) among people receiving new prosthodontic treatment in the Primary Health Centres of the three regions in Kosovo from 2002 to 2013. METHODS: The data on ARPDs delivery and CDs delivery was obtained from the archives of primary health centres from three Kosovo regions (Prizren, Peje, Ferizaj) from 2002 to 2013. The data was analysed concerning year of treatment, type of dentures, jaw, age, gender and urban or rural origin of the patients. The trend of treatment was determined, and the binomial logistic regression model was used for predicting odds of ARPD versus CD treatment by year of treatment and patient characteristics. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2013, 9,478 patients received 11,655 CDs and 4,401 ARPDs. Delivery of CDs significantly increased by 57.45 dentures per year (R2=0.609) and delivery of ARPDs by 30.39 dentures per year (R2=0.569). Each year the odds for ARPD versus CD increased by 4.2% (95% CI: 3.0%-5.4%). Younger patients have higher odds for ARPD rather than CD and odds for ARPD are decreasing as the age of patients rises. The gender, residence, and jaw all had a significant impact on prosthodontic treatment too. CONCLUSIONS: In Primary Health Centres of Kosovo, there is a trend for higher frequencies of both dentures (more obvious for ARPD), and the frequency is highly dependent on the age of patients.